I rise in support of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. When special education legislation was first enacted in 1975, the federal government, recognizing the extraordinary costs of inclusion, pledged to provide state and local education agencies with forty percent of the excess costs associated with educating students with disabilities. Sadly, the federal government has not come close to meeting this obligation, with annual appropriations never exceeding twelve percent of excess costs. The chronic underpayment of this federal mandate has left state and local governments with a burden of more than $146 billion in lost funding over the past twenty-two years--a staggering shortfall that has forced education agencies to shift resources out of lower-priority, but important necessities such as building maintenance and upkeep. Special education departments end up eating large portions of local and state school budgets, which creates a competitive relationship between regular and special education, as they vie for the same scarce funds. This situation is not the fault of school districts, but a direct result of Congress's inadequate funding of IDEA. Special education has received a billion dollar increase over the past two years. Yet even with this substantial increase, funding is still substantially below Congress's 40 percent promise. This means that states and districts will continue to be unfairly burdened by these excess costs.
Lois Capps: “I rise in support of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. When special education legislation was first…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the funding shortfall in the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act.
Share
More from Lois Capps
This would undermine the fundamental principles of the program and I cannot express enough how damaging that would be to patients and my constituents.
the safety of our nation's pipeline infrastructure is critically important to protect public health and the environment and our local economies.
We have responsibility to ensure we are considering these risks when it comes to operating all nuclear plants as safely as possible.
I demand a recorded vote. The Acting CHAIR. Pursuant to clause 6 of rule XVIII, further proceedings on the amendment offered by the gentlewoman from California will be postponed. Amendment No. 100 Offered by Mr. Grijalva The Acting CHAIR…