I will even go along with saying you can bring it back at 5 percent, if you are going to use it for job creation or research and development, for capital expenditures. And If you are going to use it to rebuild your pension fund for workers, OK, let's do it for 1 year at 5 percent. But, by gosh, can't we at least have some standards to be able to enforce it? Under the committee bill, without the Breaux-Feinstein amendment, there is no obligation that they spend one nickel more on job creation than they did last year or the year before. The only thing they have to do is say, if last year we spent $10 billion on capital expenditures, guess what. We will spend $10 billion this year. They don't have to spend one nickel, one penny more on capital expenditures or job creation or research and development in order to get this huge break. They can spend exactly what they spent last year--no requirement, zip, zero. Yet we are going to give them one of the biggest tax breaks. We already passed tax cuts of $3 trillion for job creation. Are we much better off today after all of that, some of which I supported? That is a debatable issue.
John B. Breaux: “I will even go along with saying you can bring it back at 5 percent, if you are going to use it for job creation or…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing tax policy and job creation during a floor speech.
Share
More from John B. Breaux
if we are going to look in the MARAD program for huge amounts of waste, fraud, and abuse compared to everything else, I would suggest that we're going to be spending a lot of time, with little results.
Good morning, Mr. President and colleagues. I was very interested in listening to the distinguished Senator from Georgia and the Senator from Pennsylvania. I am trying to keep track of what he was quoting from. We decided he was quoting…
it is interesting that the authors, the Senators who oppose the amendment, say the bill is going to create 660,000 jobs. If it is going to create 660,000 jobs, there is no problem. The people would be able to bring the money back and pay 5…
I start off by commending the authors of the amendment for a real serious effort to try to improve the bill. But I rise in opposition because there is not any segment of the senior population that you could not isolate and target and say…