We hear all the time from the defenders of the bureaucracy that if we move forward with these simple choice mechanisms, and we found a way to move forward with a choice mechanism that does not even affect a single penny of the money appropriated to the bureaucratic model, they still tell us this is going to somehow harm education. The gentlewoman from Pennsylvania has seen that choice makes a difference in the lives of Pennsylvania children.
Bob Schaffer: “We hear all the time from the defenders of the bureaucracy that if we move forward with these simple choice mechanisms…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of choice mechanisms on education during a debate.
Share
More from Bob Schaffer
Because without the bill, as the law stands today, let us just assume Americans who pay taxes, they will be forced to just pay that $250 to the Federal Government. That is where that money will go without our bill. What we are saying is…
That kind of accountability that the gentleman just described in Arizona is what we are trying to achieve throughout the country. It is the accountability that goes from the recipient of funds, public funds, to the one who donated those…
granting more freedom from federal mandates of--federal mandates of NCLB--does not mean lowering the bar for any child.
The current education funding formula at the Federal level is a very rigid, bureaucratic structure.