It just defies logic, but again it points out my point that these folks have had 8 years to try to help, to try to help local schools. They have really blown the opportunity. Even when they have Republicans, and we are conservatives and we like to spend less when we can, but here is a program where we believe we ought to pay for what the government promised, and we have no assistance from the White House. Al Gore, Bill Clinton, had other things they wanted to spend money on, not children with disabilities in education. It is important not only for those children, but it is important because even when Congress does not fund the program to the extent that it promised, the responsibility for carrying out the program still exists. Every principal of every school in this country has to continue to unfold and provide these services under the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act, just as the law says, and it does not matter whether we provide the money. That is the real hardship, because what a principal has to do is steal funds from other places in his or her budget.
Bob Schaffer: “It just defies logic, but again it points out my point that these folks have had 8 years to try to help, to try to help…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the funding challenges for education programs for children with disabilities.
Share
More from Bob Schaffer
The question is now, when we see all of the reform that is taking place, before you didn't know where your qualified teachers were, you wouldn't say where the distribution was, your graduation rate--any improvement made you AYP.
It is more than a win-win situation. Every dollar that the government spends today or that every taxpayer spends today through their Federal Government gets filtered through this bureaucratic process. In doing so, every dollar does not…
I have become deeply convinced of the value of parental involvement in education.
Just giving parents the opportunity to choose empowers them in a way that is helpful.