I worry that the fuel industry’s gain comes at a reputational cost for this court, which is already viewed by many as being overly sympathetic to corporate interests.

Even the mere appearance of favoritism can undermine confidence in the integrity of the judiciary.

The Court’s remarkably lenient approach to standing in this case contrasts starkly with the stern stance it has taken in cases concerning the rights of ordinary citizens.

Equal Justice Under Law remains this court’s guiding light nearly a century after those words were first engraved there.

Those of us who are privileged to work inside the court must not lose sight of this institution’s unique mission and responsibility: to rule without fear or favor.

The majority today is wrong as a matter of precedent: This Court has held that the Hobbs Act, like its precursors, sets up a single judicial review mechanism for agency rules and orders, and prevents later collateral attacks on them in…

The majority today is wrong as a matter of precedent: This Court has held that the Hobbs Act, like its precursors, sets up a single judicial review mechanism for agency rules and orders, and prevents later collateral attacks on them in…

Today's holding undermines the certainty and finality Congress sought in designing a mechanism for judicial review; it subjects all administrative schemes, and the many businesses and individuals relying on them, to the ever-present risk…

There is simply nothing in the law to support today's result.

The government may not target a business or industry through stringent and allegedly unlawful regulation, and then evade the resulting lawsuits by claiming that the targets of its regulation should be locked out of court as unaffected…

the government 'do what it wants to do regardless, rendering constraints of law irrelevant and unleashing devastation in the process.'

There should be almost no judicial scrutiny of these kinds of laws at all.

Questions regarding the law’s policy are thus appropriately left to the people, their elected representatives, and the democratic process.

The ongoing debate over the efficacy of sex-transition treatments for children confirms that medical and regulatory authorities are not of one mind.

transgender people have undoubtedly experienced discrimination

have not been able to show a history of widespread and conspicuous discrimination

Because neither Texas nor Fasken successfully intervened, they may not obtain judicial review of the commission's licensing decision under the Hobbs Act.

In short, the Hobbs Act affords judicial review to those who were parties before the commission.