In imposing a higher bar for discrimination claims based on educational services as compared to other sorts of disability discrimination claims, the chief justice declared, the lower courts bungled the unambiguous directive of the law.
Roberts criticized lower courts for setting a higher standard for educational discrimination cases.
Share
More from John Roberts
I think they view us as purely political actors, which I don’t think is an accurate understanding of what we do.
The Court misconceives the plaintiff 's injury, allowing the Executive's likely infringement of the Legislature's power of the purse and authority to regulate federal property in the District of Columbia to continue.
It would be good if people appreciated it's not the judges' fault that a correct interpretation of the law meant that, no, you don't get to do this.
The construction is a “likely infringement of the legislature’s power of the purse and authority to regulate federal property in the District of Columbia to continue”