John Roberts: “We break no new ground today.”

This case carries with it the weight of fierce scientific and policy debates about the safety, efficacy, and propriety of medical treatments in an evolving field.

In imposing a higher bar for discrimination claims based on educational services as compared to other sorts of disability discrimination claims, the chief justice declared, the lower courts bungled the unambiguous directive of the law.

It would be good if people appreciated it's not the judges' fault that a correct interpretation of the law meant that, no, you don't get to do this.

ADA and Rehabilitation claims based on educational services should be subject to the same standards that apply in other disability discrimination contexts.