I do not see how a district court can compel compliance with an order that this court has stayed.

Our emergency docket, while fit for some things, should not be used to overrule or revise existing law.

If we want gun manufacturers to pay for gun violence abroad, we need to tell members of Congress to write a different law.

If the idea is to reassure the markets, a simpler — and more judicial — approach would have been to deny the President’s application for a stay.

No one doubts that the distribution of sexually explicit speech to children, of the sort involved here, can cause great harm.

You relax strict scrutiny in one place, and all of a sudden, strict scrutiny gets relaxed in other places.

An untold number of people currently entitled to U.S. citizenship would be without lawful status to remain in the country.

It is turning over information about yourself and your viewing habits—respecting speech many find repulsive—to a website operator, and then to… who knows?

There is simply nothing in the law to support today's result.

Today's holding undermines the certainty and finality Congress sought in designing a mechanism for judicial review; it subjects all administrative schemes, and the many businesses and individuals relying on them, to the ever-present risk…

The majority today is wrong as a matter of text: The Hobbs Act gives the courts of appeals exclusive jurisdiction to determine the validity of agency action, meaning that district courts have no jurisdiction to do so.

The majority today is wrong as a matter of precedent: This Court has held that the Hobbs Act, like its precursors, sets up a single judicial review mechanism for agency rules and orders, and prevents later collateral attacks on them in…