Today's holding undermines the certainty and finality Congress sought in designing a mechanism for judicial review; it subjects all administrative schemes, and the many businesses and individuals relying on them, to the ever-present risk of disruption.
Justice Kagan's argument against the majority's ruling and its implications for judicial review.
Share
More from Elena Kagan
No one doubts that the distribution of sexually explicit speech to children, of the sort involved here, can cause great harm.
I don’t think that you would want an enforcement system that was controlled by the executive branch or by the legislature.
The Supreme Court police expect a smaller but still very substantial 38% annual increase in threats this year, which follows a 25% increase last year.
If the idea is to reassure the markets, a simpler — and more judicial — approach would have been to deny the President’s application for a stay.