On the recordJune 18, 2025
There should be almost no judicial scrutiny of these kinds of laws at all.
Said by
Clarence Thomas
Source
slate.comThere should be almost no judicial scrutiny of these kinds of laws at all.
Thomas suggests minimal judicial oversight for laws discriminating based on sex.
Share
More from Clarence Thomas
I am hopeful that this Court will soon realize that the conflict its §2 jurisprudence has sown with the Constitution is too severe to ignore.
This Court routinely declines to provide relief to law-abiding Americans when it would actually matter, even after lower courts conspicuously flout this Court's precedents in ruling against them.
For over three decades, I have called for 'a systematic reassessment of our interpretation of §2.'
Congress requires this Court to exercise jurisdiction over constitutional challenges to congressional redistricting, and we accordingly have an obligation to resolve such challenges promptly.