On the recordJune 18, 2025
There should be almost no judicial scrutiny of these kinds of laws at all.
Said by
Clarence Thomas
There should be almost no judicial scrutiny of these kinds of laws at all.
Thomas suggests minimal judicial oversight for laws discriminating based on sex.
Share
More from Clarence Thomas
Intervention serves no purpose other than to exacerbate the already egregious delays endemic to capital litigation.
If they can prove you wrong, fine. But if they call you names or say you’re not black, I mean, how stupid is that? Look at me.
Then my question is, why is it then that you have a problem with me embracing certain ideas in certain books? What's the difference?’
These are the only cases argued this Term in which our jurisdiction is mandatory.