Clarence Thomas: “There seems to be this overwhelming pressure for us to agree with the prevailing notions which I consider almost…”

Then my question is, why is it then that you have a problem with me embracing certain ideas in certain books? What's the difference?’

This provision sweeps too broadly, interferes with the party-candidate relationship, and has not been proved necessary to combat corruption.

It is unfortunate that the Court chose to intervene at the request of a convicted murderer to correct the Eleventh Circuit's inconsequential foot fault.

We have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.