Clarence Thomas: “I mean, how stupid is that? Look at me.”

It is unfortunate that the Court chose to intervene at the request of a convicted murderer to correct the Eleventh Circuit's inconsequential foot fault.

This provision sweeps too broadly, interferes with the party-candidate relationship, and has not been proved necessary to combat corruption.

Congress must use clearer language under the Constitution’s spending clause if it wishes to outlaw such unintentional discrimination.

We have a duty to ‘correct the error’ established in those precedents.