Clarence Thomas: “For over three decades, I have called for 'a systematic reassessment of our interpretation of §2.'”

I said, ‘What if they allowed me in but said I couldn't go to certain floors? That would be wrong.’

This provision sweeps too broadly, interferes with the party-candidate relationship, and has not been proved necessary to combat corruption.

The ongoing debate over the efficacy of sex-transition treatments for children confirms that medical and regulatory authorities are not of one mind.

It is unfortunate that the Court chose to intervene at the request of a convicted murderer to correct the Eleventh Circuit's inconsequential foot fault.