The public safety minister has said that he will investigate Canada's security screening processes and 'get to the bottom of what happened.' Canadians deserve to know what happened, and Parliament has a responsibility to demand those…

Canadians deserve to know what happened, and Parliament has a responsibility to demand those answers.

These allegations are deeply concerning and raise serious questions about Canada's national security screening processes.

Parliament must determine whether there were gaps in Canada's security screening system and whether those gaps could have exposed sensitive information or put the security of Canada and our allies at risk.

Make no mistake, a court will consider the words that we pass on paper here someday, and they will decide the constitutionality of those words.

The fact that we were able to do this in a year (after McCourt’s death), to me, speaks to the cooperation but also the necessity. Intimate partner violence is a scourge on society.

The issue is, are things too slow for Canadians, or perhaps are we going to move too fast for Canadians?

When you ram legislation through over objections, or over considerations, from law professors and civil liberties groups, you have a problem.

What (the minister) calls taking time, we call democracy.

What he calls can filibuster, I call scrutiny. What he calls taking time, we call democracy.

The Criminal Code will soon be updated to allow for a charge of first-degree murder against the killer of an intimate partner, regardless of whether the act was premeditated.

The Liberals are attempting to ram Bill C-22 in a speedy and undemocratic way.

They're using their manufactured majority in what might be the most aggressive programming motion I've ever seen.

The Liberals should be getting dangerous criminals off our streets and stopping illegal guns from crossing our borders.