On the recordDecember 5, 2024
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to the amendment. This amendment simply strikes the entire bill and replaces it with a training mandate. Claiming that training is all that is necessary to help agencies comply with their obligations under the RFA completely ignores the problems that the Prove It Act is going to solve. The Small Business Administration already offers training sessions for regulators and has done so for over 20 years. According to the SBA, they held nine training sessions and trained 139 Federal officials in 2023 alone. Further, the SBA has already trained personnel at nearly every Federal agency and department since 2003. Despite this training, however, in 2023, SBA sent 46 letters to agencies across government outlining the deficiencies in their RFA analysis. In 30 cases, the SBA found that agencies conducted inadequate analysis of small business impacts. What this means is that during the rulemaking process for 30 rules, agencies did not comply with already existing law despite the SBA training they likely received. Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote against this amendment, and I reserve the balance of my time.





