yesterday in a special order, I expressed my total disbelief that, at an event convened at taxpayer's expense, a Member of this House would publicly charge that a Member of the U.S. Senate should be tarred and feathered and run out of the country. Was this a joke, Mr. Speaker? From press accounts, what we do know is that it was a reaction to a constituent's call for the murder of a Member of the other body, and that the murderer be given a medal. The Member from Washington State in question with whom I have spoken, did not object to the murder of a U.S. Senator. The member did not attempt to argue at all, instead Mr. Speaker, he fueled the flames of violence against members of the people's house, against the representatives elected by the American people. Let me read from a definition of ``tar and feathers'': Pouring molten tar over the body and covering it with feathers was an official punishment in England as early as the 12th century. It was never legal in the United States, but was always a mob--demonstration. The practice finally vanished in the late 19th Century. But now, Mr. Speaker, a Member of the House wants to resurrect the practice--to drag the American people, not toward the next millennium, but back to the last. Is this the course the new majorities in the Congress have set? Is this a new contract of tar and feathering, of drawing and quartering, of star chambers and chambers of torture for the American people?
Nick Rahall: “yesterday in a special order, I expressed my total disbelief that, at an event convened at taxpayer's expense, a Member…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing violent rhetoric and threats against members of Congress.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
I am very happy at this time to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Peterson), a strong supporter, the cosponsor of this legislation, original cosponsor of it, and the ranking member of the Committee on Agriculture.
On Monday, the EPA is expected to unleash what is essentially a Federal cap-and-trade proposal aimed at our Nation's existing coal-fired power plants. I will oppose this rule, as it will adversely affect coal miners and coal mining…
May I have the time remaining, please. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from West Virginia has 1 minute remaining, and the gentleman from Pennsylvania has 6 minutes remaining.
In closing, much has been said today in dislike of this temporary fix, and I could not agree more. It is not my preference. We all want to address this in a long-term, robust manner. That is also the opinion of the Transportation Trades…





