I do not view this particular legislation as a pet project of a powerful person, regardless of it being the Speaker's bill. I have been contacted, I know, from Democratic Members on my side of the aisle in support of this legislation, including the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Lipinski) and the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Costello). I happen to believe that it would be a waste of taxpayers' money for the National Park Service to study this matter. The facts are the facts. As I said in my opening statement, Ronald Reagan lived at this site. I do not believe we need a study to determine that. The home has been restored. It is being operated as a museum. So I do not believe that taxpayers' money would necessarily be spent wisely to conduct a study of these very same facts. I can assure the gentleman from Colorado that I am not being swayed because it is the Speaker's bill. I am on the minority side of the aisle. So I would close and urge adoption of the bill.
Nick Rahall: “I do not view this particular legislation as a pet project of a powerful person, regardless of it being the Speaker's…”
On the recordNovember 13, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Addressing opposition to a bill regarding a site associated with Ronald Reagan.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
Nov 17, 2014
Your commitment to bipartisanship has proven that together we can do great things.
Dec 3, 2014
May I have a time check, please. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from West Virginia has 10 minutes remaining. The gentleman from California has 9\1/2\ minutes remaining.
Jul 31, 2014
I am happy to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio), a valued member of our Transportation and Infrastructure Committee and the ranking member of the House Natural Resources Committee. Mr. DeFAZIO. Madam Speaker, I…
Jun 8, 2023
We need a partnership, a co-partnership here, if you will, with GSA and OMB to work through this issue.





