The main issue is the fact that in the pending legislation, alternatives to renewable energy development would be eliminated. Take one example from my home State of West Virginia. If a developer comes in and wants to develop a wind farm on a beautiful mountain site in Pocahontas County, then the way this bill is constructed, there are only two alternatives. Either the developer's initial proposal accepted or rejected; or a rejection, no project at all. There would be no process whereby alternative sites would be considered, whether for environmental or whether for economic or whether for social or whatever other reasons may come into play. The developer could not consider an alternative site maybe over another mountain ridge, because this pending bill, by wiping out the Federal agency's alternative to look at alternatives, strikes that completely; and that is the main reason that I am opposing this bill.
Nick Rahall: “The main issue is the fact that in the pending legislation, alternatives to renewable energy development would be…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of legislation on renewable energy development and public comment periods.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
May I have the time remaining, please. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from West Virginia has 1 minute remaining, and the gentleman from Pennsylvania has 6 minutes remaining.
I am very happy at this time to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Peterson), a strong supporter, the cosponsor of this legislation, original cosponsor of it, and the ranking member of the Committee on Agriculture.
At this time, it is my pleasure to yield 4 minutes to the gentlelady from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur), a very powerful lady on the Committee on Appropriations, the ranking member on Energy and Water Development.
Appropriations shall not be made available for the destruction of healthy, unadopted wild horses and burros.





