I understand the bipartisan fashion in which he speaks. The clean coal language in the bill, while I am not detracting from the use of clean coal technology, I do not cosponsor this particular provision. It happened to come out of the Committee on Energy and Commerce, not the Committee on Resources. I might also say to the gentleman, that the coal that happens to come from my particular region of southern West Virginia is already clean coal. Clean coal technologies are fine, and I do not speak against them, but we do not have to apply those technologies to the coal that comes out of southern West Virginia and eastern Kentucky, which is some of the cleanest burning coal, low sulfur content, high btu.
Nick Rahall: “I understand the bipartisan fashion in which he speaks. The clean coal language in the bill, while I am not detracting…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing clean coal technology and its application to coal from West Virginia.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
I am very honored at this time to yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Bishop), the distinguished ranking member of our Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment on our Transportation Committee, although we are not in…
I am happy to yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Enyart), who is on the Agriculture Committee and an original sponsor of the legislation. He has been of tremendous help in moving this forward.
At this time, I am happy to yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran), who is leaving this august body, but certainly, we will continue to rely upon his wisdom and friendship, wisdom that is except on this particular bill…
I am very happy at this time to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Minnesota (Mr. Peterson), a strong supporter, the cosponsor of this legislation, original cosponsor of it, and the ranking member of the Committee on Agriculture.





