I understand the point that the gentleman from California raises, and it is not one with which I disagree. If I might say, in due process, in due time that will be considered by this Congress. I have no question about it. This bill is not a comprehensive energy bill. Nobody is out here touting it as such. That is to be addressed later. This is part of our 6 for '06 agenda; it is to get us started in the right direction, and my agenda on the Natural Resources Committee will go much further than this, not only hearings on our bills and legislation, but extensive oversight over the entire oil and gas leasing program both offshore and onshore.
Nick Rahall: “I understand the point that the gentleman from California raises, and it is not one with which I disagree. If I might…”
On the recordJanuary 18, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the scope and intent of an energy bill during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
Nov 17, 2014
Your commitment to bipartisanship has proven that together we can do great things.
Sep 9, 2014
At this time, it is my pleasure to yield 4 minutes to the gentlelady from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur), a very powerful lady on the Committee on Appropriations, the ranking member on Energy and Water Development.
Sep 9, 2014
At this time, I am happy to yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran), who is leaving this august body, but certainly, we will continue to rely upon his wisdom and friendship, wisdom that is except on this particular bill…
Jun 8, 2023
We need a partnership, a co-partnership here, if you will, with GSA and OMB to work through this issue.





