we developed a set of criteria by which projects had to answer, a long list of questions. One of those questions at the very top was about whether the State supported the project or not. We did not put a project into ISTEA without full 100-percent written testimony from the States that they supported such projects. As I said earlier, these projects were scrutinized, scrubbed, and there was not a one put in there without State support, not without State support.
Nick Rahall: “we developed a set of criteria by which projects had to answer, a long list of questions. One of those questions at the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the criteria for project inclusion in the ISTEA during a floor speech.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
How much time do I have remaining, Mr. Speaker. The SPEAKER pro tempore. The gentleman from West Virginia has 1 minute remaining.
At this time, I am happy to yield 4 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Moran), who is leaving this august body, but certainly, we will continue to rely upon his wisdom and friendship, wisdom that is except on this particular bill…
I am glad to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Oregon (Mr. DeFazio), a distinguished member of our Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Mr. DeFAZIO. Mr. Speaker, we can pretend that we care about the future of America and…
We need a partnership, a co-partnership here, if you will, with GSA and OMB to work through this issue.





