We developed a set of criteria by which projects had to answer, a long list of questions. One of those questions at the very top was about whether the State supported the project or not. We did not put a project into ISTEA without full 100-percent written testimony from the States that they supported such projects. As I said earlier, these projects were scrutinized, scrubbed, and there was not a one put in there without State support, not without State support.
Nick Rahall: “We developed a set of criteria by which projects had to answer, a long list of questions. One of those questions at the…”
On the recordApril 17, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the criteria for project inclusion in the ISTEA during a floor speech.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
Sep 9, 2014
At this time, it is my pleasure to yield 4 minutes to the gentlelady from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur), a very powerful lady on the Committee on Appropriations, the ranking member on Energy and Water Development.
Jun 8, 2023
We need a partnership, a co-partnership here, if you will, with GSA and OMB to work through this issue.
Nov 17, 2014
Your commitment to bipartisanship has proven that together we can do great things.
Nov 17, 2014
I will miss working with you and all of my esteem colleagues from both sides of the aisle, but I know that with your leadership, and your bipartisanship, and your transparent manner of operating this committee, this Nation's future is in…





