Just to clarify for my colleague from Washington, my ranking member, if his concern was about the taxpayer ending up paying for something that BP should be liable for under the gentleman from Louisiana's amendment, we do have a catch-all provision in the legislation that applies to not only the entire legislation, but would apply to the gentleman from Louisiana's amendment as well that says none of the funds that are authorized or made available by this act may be used to carry out any activity or pay any cost for removal or damages for which a responsible party, BP, is liable under the OPA.
Nick Rahall: “Just to clarify for my colleague from Washington, my ranking member, if his concern was about the taxpayer ending up…”
Editor's note · Context
Rahall addresses concerns about taxpayer liability related to BP's responsibilities under proposed legislation.
Share
More from Nick Rahall
Your commitment to bipartisanship has proven that together we can do great things.
At this time, it is my pleasure to yield 4 minutes to the gentlelady from Ohio (Ms. Kaptur), a very powerful lady on the Committee on Appropriations, the ranking member on Energy and Water Development.
I will miss working with you and all of my esteem colleagues from both sides of the aisle, but I know that with your leadership, and your bipartisanship, and your transparent manner of operating this committee, this Nation's future is in…
Appropriations shall not be made available for the destruction of healthy, unadopted wild horses and burros.





