It appears that the social cost of carbon is nothing but a political tool lacking scientific integrity and transparency conceived and utilized by an Administration pushing a green agenda to the detriment of the American taxpayers.
Jenkins criticizes the social cost of carbon as a politically motivated tool against taxpayers.
Share & report
More from Evan Jenkins
I want to thank you, like so many around this table, for the clear articulation of why the Paris Accord was such a bad deal.
If signed into law, the DOE and the EPA would no longer rely on manipulated and fabricated economic benefits to justify or support new job-killing environmental regulations.
We are trying to politely encourage and prod OSM to not treat it in the traditional way, but in the manner in which we intended.
Other voices in this conversation
