There may be a court interpretation of that. But you have under your amendment a review of subsection (d), ``without observance of the procedure required by law.'' According to what you have said, you are going to review the procedure because that is what subsection (d) says. We do limit under our amendment. Our amendment is limited specifically to whether the final agency action is ``arbitrary and capricious.'' That is much narrower than that which you state. It is at least ambiguous.
David Cay Johnston: “There may be a court interpretation of that. But you have under your amendment a review of subsection (d), ``without…”
On the recordJuly 17, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the limitations of an amendment related to agency action review.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Feb 6, 2019
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Jul 31, 1996
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
Jul 31, 1996
Nuclear waste traveling the country is, first of all, solid in form. It is sealed in a cask that, as I say, if you get a direct hit by something 30 times more powerful than an antitank weapon, what do you get? You get a third of an ounce…





