when the matter originally came up, I strongly opposed the resolution because it seemed to be a shift of ground away from the Shanghai Communique which has been the basis for almost a quarter of a century of our relationship to China. Mr. President, we are deeply grateful, Senator Nunn, Senator Feinstein, and I, and others, who had serious objection to the resolution in its original form. With Senator Thomas, Senator Murkowski, and others, we are now working this out in a balanced way that makes clear that this Nation continues to adhere to the one-China policy, as enunciated in the Shanghai Communique and the communiques since that time under five American presidents. I believe it is not a perfect resolution, but it is a balanced resolution. On that basis, I can vote for it. I thank the Chair.
David Cay Johnston: “when the matter originally came up, I strongly opposed the resolution because it seemed to be a shift of ground away…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a resolution related to U.S.-China relations and the one-China policy.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
The difference between our treatment of the three is that we isolated Burma, and General Ne Win isolated himself, whereas, because of the cold war, we embraced the Taiwanese, we embraced the South Koreans. Today, having been isolated for…
And the Senator would not disagree you can't take away that right legislatively, can you?





