There is the standard right there. It is plain English. It is as plain as it can be. It is ``arbitrary and capricious or abuse of discretion,'' that is the sole and only basis for review of the cost-benefit analysis or of the risk assessment. That is it. Look, read the language.
Discussing the standards for reviewing cost-benefit analysis and risk assessment.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The Senator is aware that Vietnam is anxious to have aid from the American Bar Association in helping them develop the rule of law. We have not had that kind of request from Libya and Cuba and others. They are anxious to develop the rule…
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?
I want to briefly reply to a statement that was made a little earlier by the Senator from Nevada, quoting me a few years back saying that nuclear powerplants were running out of space. The fact of the matter is, that statement was true…
Thus, we hold that the Nuclear Waste Policy Act creates an obligation in DOE to start disposing of the spent nuclear fuel no later than January 31, 1998. Is there any disagreement with what I read in the decision?
Other voices in this conversation
