Under the law of the Supreme Court, in the Chevron case, the last and most definitive case I know of on the issue, they say specifically if the Congress has specifically spoken to an issue and the intent is clear, then the agency must follow the intent of Congress--``Must'' follow.
Discussing the implications of the Chevron case on agency compliance with congressional intent.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…
What is the difference in liability between having the duty to dispose of and in taking title?
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Other voices in this conversation
