On the recordJuly 11, 1995
Not true, Mr. President, I tell my colleague, because there is nothing here--first of all, I do not know of any statute that says a minimum of so many parts per million with discretion to go higher.
Source
govinfo.govDavid Cay Johnston: “Not true, Mr. President, I tell my colleague, because there is nothing here--first of all, I do not know of any statute…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing a point of contention regarding environmental regulations.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Jul 30, 1996
There are many reasons to be against the McCain amendment, but the clearest, most indelible, most compelling reason is that to cut these funds now would subject the U.S. Government to greater penalties for termination costs than it would…
Sep 25, 2023
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
Jul 31, 1996
The point is this, though: They have tested it with weapons 30 times bigger than antitank weapons with direct hits. That caused a breach. Only a third of an ounce comes out. There are many, many much more lucrative targets, by orders of…
Jul 31, 1996
Let us take this one at a time. You agree with me the Government has no right to take away vested rights, and would be liable for the violation?
Other voices in this conversation
