If you would just leave out that ``in the event of conflict,'' because there is no conflict. That is why we say it shall supplement and not supersede, because we have written it in such a way that it does not conflict and we do not want courts to find conflict where none is there.
David Cay Johnston: “If you would just leave out that ``in the event of conflict,'' because there is no conflict. That is why we say it shall…”
On the recordJuly 11, 1995
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing legal language to avoid perceived conflicts in legislation.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Jul 31, 1996
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…
Feb 6, 2019
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Jul 31, 1996
Nuclear waste traveling the country is, first of all, solid in form. It is sealed in a cask that, as I say, if you get a direct hit by something 30 times more powerful than an antitank weapon, what do you get? You get a third of an ounce…





