Those may be requirements of risk assessment or cost-benefit analysis which, to the extent they are relevant, can be used to challenge the final agency action. Maybe so. But those are only arguments you make. The first one there is notice. Do you really think you are going to throw out a final agency action as being arbitrary and capricious because they did not give notice?
Discussing the standards for challenging final agency actions.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
The decision of the court of appeals makes clear that they have a vested right to the title passing as of the time that the nuclear repository is built and not until that time, but they have the duty to dispose of the waste January 31…
Then how in the world can the Senator say they are transferring the duty of disposing of nuclear waste from the Federal Government or the taxpayers and giving that to the utilities?
Donald has a long history of, you know, cheating, lying under oath, presenting false documents.
Other voices in this conversation
