the shift in power which this would bring out would be absolutely mind-boggling to me. You know, the whole fight would be, ``Can you get in the President's budget or not?'' It would make total supplicants of all Members of Congress. You might like that if you like the President. I think this President is going to be reelected. I like him. I must say I do not like him enough to turn over to him, and to all of his successors, the power of the purse when it is vested by the Constitution in this Congress. Madam President, my colleague, Senator Byrd, and others, made a powerful statement about the unconstitutionality of this provision earlier today. They surely are right. If we do not stand up for the rights of the Congress under the Constitution, I hope the courts will. I will support the Senator from West Virginia.
David Cay Johnston: “the shift in power which this would bring out would be absolutely mind-boggling to me. You know, the whole fight would…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a proposed shift in budgetary power from Congress to the President.
Share
More from David Cay Johnston
Let us take this one at a time. You agree with me the Government has no right to take away vested rights, and would be liable for the violation?
This is absolutely devastating for Donald Trump, and unless a Court of Appeals overturns this, which I would think highly unlikely, we're going to see his properties seized, dissolved, and the creditors paid off, and he will be permanently…
The Nation has more than three decades of experience transporting both civilian and DOE-owned spent fuel. In 1997, 471 shipments were made, 444 of which were by truck. In the 1980's, 100 to 200 such shipments were typically made each year…





