But when confronted with individual items coming back in a Presidential line-item veto or rescission, if my colleagues will, and knowing that the full public scrutiny is, ``How did you vote on this controversial area or this controversial project,'' it is very likely that a majority would sustain that Presidential line-item veto or rescission. So it really gets down to two-thirds, or really gets down to whether one wants one-third plus one to run the appropriations process or one wants a majority vote. I remind my Republican colleagues and Democratic colleagues that 342 Members voted for this language in the past Congress. So, with the Wise-Spratt-Stenholm substitute, Mr. Chairman, the President can rescind, the President is guaranteed a vote in Congress within 10 days of it coming to the Congress, and there is total accountability because the public sees how we vote on each item. I would ask that my colleagues uphold our substitute and guaranteed majority rule as opposed to one-third plus one.
Bob Wise: “But when confronted with individual items coming back in a Presidential line-item veto or rescission, if my colleagues…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a Presidential line-item veto and advocating for a substitute amendment.
Share
More from Bob Wise
today in Salem, West Virginia, in a quiet funeral service, former United States Senator Jennings Randolph comes home to his final rest, to where he grew up and lived. And indeed perhaps it is a fitting memorial to Senator Randolph that…
recently, on Earth Day, Senator Terry Sanford of North Carolina was buried in Durham, North Carolina; and I deeply regretted that I could not be there. In many ways, Senator Sanford was responsible for that because of opportunities that he…
I think with the eloquence of many who have spoken here on both sides, it is important to remember what happened 9 years ago in Tiananmen Square. The people must remember. The U.S. Congress must remember. The President of the United States…
I want to say that apparently the gentleman may not be aware, that raised the question, that the EDA has cut its overhead at least 25 percent, I believe as much as one-third of the number of jobs in the central office over the past few…





