I simply want to say that, for those who would feel that it is hard to make progress sometimes when there is only an option of more prosecution or more regulation, then this board, I think, meets those concerns because the information derived from its findings cannot be used in prosecution or litigation. For those who believe from an environmental standpoint that we need more investigation of chemical accidents, this board also meets those concerns. That is why I am grateful for the bipartisan support, such as the gentleman from Pennsylvania [Mr. Fox], the gentleman from New York [Mr. Boehlert], the gentleman from California [Mr. Miller], and others who have been so active in promoting this.
Bob Wise: “I simply want to say that, for those who would feel that it is hard to make progress sometimes when there is only an…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the establishment of a board to investigate chemical accidents and its bipartisan support.
Share
More from Bob Wise
I am one of the one-third of the Democrats that voted for the bill, but it seems to me it is the Republican leadership that is responsible for appointing conferees and moving it to conference. Why has that not happened?
I agree if the gentleman's amendment passes, that will be X amount of jobs that will not be created. The gentleman will want to put it into drug courts. I am trying to keep people out of drug courts by giving them a job in the first place.
I want to say that apparently the gentleman may not be aware, that raised the question, that the EDA has cut its overhead at least 25 percent, I believe as much as one-third of the number of jobs in the central office over the past few…
To drive high school improvement, supporting Congressman Hinojosa's Graduation Promise Act.





