I would suggest that the reason we are in this tough position is because of the budget that the majority has come forward with and the stingy allocation that it results in for not only this subcommittee, but for all appropriation subcommittees. That is what the distinguished gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Obey), the ranking member, has spoken to so eloquently throughout this process, the fact that we have a budget agreement supported and written by the majority which is totally unrealistic and totally inadequate when we come over to the other part of the budget process, and that is the appropriation process. That is why we do not have enough money in this bill for vouchers and for NASA and for science research. We do not need to starve domestic discretionary programs in this time of prosperity.
Alan B. Mollohan: “I would suggest that the reason we are in this tough position is because of the budget that the majority has come…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing budget allocations and their impact on domestic programs during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
NASA has been on the forefront of safety on the NASA side, these provisions she has worked on in 2005 to incorporate into authorizing. She is reaffirming these safety procedures in this amendment, and we certainly have no objection on…
My point is that we hope that the Commerce Department will focus just as aggressively on unfair imports as we are in trying to break the barriers, unfair barriers that exist to our exports.
I think both the chairman and the ranking member are right on when they talk about some sort of systemic reform.
His values that he came here with he continued to want to express. It was very important for him to continue his service as chairman of the Labor, HHS, Education Subcommittee where he could really affect all of those constituencies, which…





