I likewise rise in opposition to this amendment and echo the sentiments expressed by a number of speakers. This simply is not the appropriate bill. This is not the appropriate forum to decide this issue. In response to the last speaker, whether it is a simple issue or a complex issue, I do not know whether that is really the point. The fact is, it is a very controversial issue and should best be decided by the authorizing committee. I am advised--and again because this is an appropriations committee, not an authorizing committee and we do not get into these things in substance like this-- that there are very serious concerns raised by representatives of the biotech industry and other areas in industry about the effect that this amendment could have on the incentives which our system now has for innovative new research procedures. In any event, all of those issues are for consideration by an authorizing committee, and because controversy does surround it, I think that is the better forum.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment during a discussion on appropriations and its appropriateness for the authorizing committee.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
I find myself agreeing with everything the gentleman has argued, and at the same time being, unfortunately, opposed to his amendment. It's hard for any of us to argue or to have a desire in our hearts to do anything but increase the…
under this project, funds would be used to support the East Coast shellfish aquaculture industry. I think the gentlelady has eloquently stated the merits of this request. The committee has looked at it, vetted it, spent hours going over…
I just will stipulate to our concerns about trade with China and the necessity to review it. That is why we have this office. You are suggesting that we need additional funding. You are suggesting doubling the funding, which impacts Census…





