Since we are talking about increasing inadequate funding in the bill, let me explain that in our law enforcement agencies, we had a gap in the funding of the bill versus the need. The Department of Justice faced the challenge to fill authorized positions in all of its components, and partly as a result of chronic gaps between the funding requested by the President and the appropriation for these administration accounts and the true cost of paying for raises. We had going into this bill, underfunding in the Department of Justice, which we have tried very hard to address. The offsets for funding SCAAP in this amendment impact those administration accounts in Justice and in Commerce. These are real people doing real jobs, and we have very carefully funded them. These accounts are underfunded by the President, just like SCAAP and just like Legal Services are underfunded. We have tried to balance priorities as we move forward, and there are lots of people concerned about these offsets.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing funding gaps in law enforcement and the Department of Justice during a committee meeting.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
I'm especially proud to be on David Obey's team, serving as one of the chairmen of one of the subcommittees under David's jurisdiction. David has long distinguished himself in public service. He started in the Wisconsin Assembly in 1963…
No. It's terminal. It's a bad offset. It degrades the Census Bureau's ability to collect economic statistics, which is terrible. But please.
If I leave you with one message, it is science agencies must play a leadership role in the improvement of science education.
I would be very chagrined if we ever did anything but treat the gentleman fair. He is an outstanding Member of the Congress. Mr. Speaker, a lot of Members are very interested in USPTO and interested in fixing it on the authorizing side…





