I simply want to point out here that the only shutdown associated with this issue is the shutdown that is contained in this bill, the shutdown that is threatened by the language which limits the appropriation for census to midyear. That is the only shutdown we are talking about. The President had an agreement with the Republican majority. That agreement was untenable. That agreement is not even a part of this debate. I do not know why we have even alluded to it. The fact is the only shutdown that we are looking at is the language in this bill that would shut down the census at midyear next year and that threatens a viable census. I think it is important to understand that, that the threat to the 2000 census is contained in the bill, and the Mollohan amendment would free that up, allow it to be funded for the whole year.
Alan B. Mollohan: “I simply want to point out here that the only shutdown associated with this issue is the shutdown that is contained in…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill on the 2000 census during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
I find myself agreeing with everything the gentleman has argued, and at the same time being, unfortunately, opposed to his amendment. It's hard for any of us to argue or to have a desire in our hearts to do anything but increase the…
under this project, funds would be used to support the East Coast shellfish aquaculture industry. I think the gentlelady has eloquently stated the merits of this request. The committee has looked at it, vetted it, spent hours going over…
I think both the chairman and the ranking member are right on when they talk about some sort of systemic reform.
If I leave you with one message, it is science agencies must play a leadership role in the improvement of science education.





