I want to go on record as strongly opposing these proposed cuts in the advanced technology program, in the manufacturing extension program, and in the Office of Technology Policy. Of course it is relevant to comment on these cuts because the NIST internal labs support the other commerce technology programs. This is part of the reason why we desperately need this funding. According to the charts contained in the World Competitiveness Report of 1994, the United States ranks 28th, behind Japan, Germany and all of our other major competitors in the percentage of government funding allocated to non-defense research and development. We rank fifth in total expenditure of R&D as a percentage of our GDP, and 19th in real growth of private sector R&D investment. Let's face it. Our competitors are heavily investing in programs similar to the commerce civilian technology initiatives.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing proposed cuts to commerce technology programs during a discussion on budget rescissions.
Share
More from Alan B. Mollohan
I just will stipulate to our concerns about trade with China and the necessity to review it. That is why we have this office. You are suggesting that we need additional funding. You are suggesting doubling the funding, which impacts Census…
I think this amendment is one more expression of a number one concern about the attention that education is getting in our various science accounts. We have attempted very diligently, pointedly, to address that by increasing funding in…
Mr. Speaker, it was with profound sadness that I learned yesterday of the passing of Senator Robert C. Byrd. This country knew Senator Byrd as one of the lions of the Senate, a ferocious advocate for his State and a principled spokesman…
I point out that when the gentleman brought his interest in CASA to the attention of the committee, I pointed out to him that CASA is funded in our bill at the authorized limit of $12 million. We don't suggest that it does not merit and…





