I mean, when I see that the Speaker of the House is saying, no, he will not have hearings, I say to my friend from Pennsylvania--I mean I think it is the Speaker of the House that we have to talk to. He is the one that said, ``Under no conditions will we have hearings; this is not going to be brought up in Congress.'' And I know the White House has some interest in this, so I know there is a lot of pressure here. But, quite frankly, I also feel, if I may be so bold as to say I think there is a real coverup going on, too--I mean how long are these documents going to be held?
Toby Roth: “I mean, when I see that the Speaker of the House is saying, no, he will not have hearings, I say to my friend from…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker is discussing the lack of congressional hearings and potential coverup regarding certain documents.
Share
More from Toby Roth
our society is rapidly becoming a world of instant communications, of masses of information available through countless databanks. Last fall, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal reported a major incident--a broad scale…
members of the Clinton administration and high officials in the Democratic National Committee all insist that there is no scandal. I beg to differ. The scandal is that 80 percent, 80 percent of the State chartered S&L's in Arkansas…
as the Congress begins the new session it is disturbing to read in the front page of the newspaper that people's opinion of the Congress is at an all-time low. The savings and loan crisis is just one of the issues that has eroded public…
Yes. But other than that, they are not going to give those documents. How is Congress ever gong to exercise sufficient oversight? How are the American people ever going to know? I do not want to----





