I respond to the gentleman from Michigan by saying the White House has agreed to a special prosecutor, yes, but they were dragged in kicking and screaming, and, as far as the House not having hearings, why every newspaper in the country carried Speaker Foley's comments that we are not going to have hearings on this issue in the House. So, it is a matter of public record.
Toby Roth: “I respond to the gentleman from Michigan by saying the White House has agreed to a special prosecutor, yes, but they…”
Editor's note · Context
The speaker addresses the decision of the White House regarding a special prosecutor and the lack of House hearings.
Share
More from Toby Roth
I looked upon their actions in Cambodia as a very important step forward, severely circumscribed by the legislation that made it possible but, nevertheless, a step in the right direction.
I am going to ask my friends and colleagues to vote against this Walker amendment because I do feel it would gut this provision of the clearinghouse and it would hurt small business and entrepreneurs. That is precisely what I am trying to…
I mean, when I see that the Speaker of the House is saying, no, he will not have hearings, I say to my friend from Pennsylvania--I mean I think it is the Speaker of the House that we have to talk to. He is the one that said, ``Under no…
Or the majority. You know, you are gong to be surprised because I asked him, ``Did you give those documents to----'', and the chairman of our subcommittee interrupted and said, ``Mr. Fiechter, you don't have to answer those questions. That…





