One more time, if I can, colleagues, let us put this in some kind of perspective. There is a simple fundamental question in front of this body today: ``Do you trust a State legislature and a Governor to run their own affairs?'' And I think the answer fundamentally has to be ``yes.'' And my colleague, the gentleman from Wisconsin [Mr. Gunderson], hit the nail on the head. I mean, sure, these waiver applications may get approved, but only if it gets rewritten and gets changed and gets modified and it gets capitalized, and at the end of the day we do not have Wisconsin's welfare plan, we have Washington's welfare plan. But my colleagues could put a Wisconsin sweatshirt on, and it does not make them a badger inside. The question is: ``If you rewrite a third of these regulations or a quarter of the regulations or half of the regulations, at the end of the day it's not Wisconsin's plan.'' We have the first comprehensive plan passed in the country, two-thirds of the State assembly, three-quarters of the State senate, the Governor's opponent for Governor the last time around, the Senate minority leader, a larger majority of Democrats as well as Republicans. The fundamental question today is: ``Whose values are you going to trust: the people sitting at the lunch counter in Wisconsin or the bureaucrats down the road on `Dependence Avenue,' '' as the gentleman from Michigan [Mr. Hoekstra] appropriately characterized it?
Scott Klug: “One more time, if I can, colleagues, let us put this in some kind of perspective. There is a simple fundamental question…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing state versus federal control over welfare plans during a congressional debate.
Share
More from Scott Klug
the rule we have before us this afternoon and soon the bill itself that will follow has to do with changing law, and changing law that has affected the communications industry since the 1930's, but it is not just about changing law. It is…
Since 1991, ARC roads or quarters received over $599 million in funding from ISTEA for demonstration projects alone. That is on top of the funding that is done on this bill. That is money that comes out of the transportation appropriations…
I think this is an indication in the dialog we just saw, a very clear indication in the fundamental debate here. There were 30 hearings and townhall meetings in Wisconsin, and there were 120 hours of debate, there were 2,000 residents who…
I think anything but the contrary. The public, which should be involved in this decision, has already been involved in the decision. It is the residents of the State of Wisconsin who had 30 hearings and town meetings, 120 hours of debate…





