Let me say I appreciate the comments of my friend from Connecticut, as I always do. I just want to point out that the amendment I have offered, as opposed to the one I offered in committee, has increased the time for deciding these motions from 60 days to 180 days. Surely 6 months is plenty of time, even in a complicated motion. So I believe the concerns of the Judicial Conference have been addressed, unless we in the Congress are going to go along with the idea there should be no time limit at all. At this point I simply leave it at that, hoping that prior to the time of actually voting on the amendment tomorrow I would have a few minutes to repeat and reiterate my position on this amendment. I yield the floor.
Russ Feingold: “Let me say I appreciate the comments of my friend from Connecticut, as I always do. I just want to point out that the…”
On the recordFebruary 9, 2005
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to the time for deciding motions during Senate debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Mar 25, 2021
I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.
Jul 26, 2021
Democracy and human rights go hand in hand, and DRL is at the forefront of implementing President Biden's commitment to human rights.
Sep 12, 2021
The hypocrisy here is important. The fact that a state like Texas is invading the privacy of women on abortion... but they're saying that somehow, it's wrong to make sure that we all get a vaccine to protect each other.
Jul 26, 2021
I recommend Sarah Margon as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor.





