The determination by the Parliamentarian leaves no doubt that the debate the Senate is engaged in today is an explicit and required exercise in war powers under the law of this country. I am pleased about that. But I do have a few concerns about other aspects of the process that we have undertaken. First, I am concerned about the President's action. I remain concerned that although the President did send a letter to the Congress acknowledging that hostilities had broken out, he did not submit the report required under section 4(a) of the War Powers Resolution. Now, nonetheless, as the Parliamentarian has ruled, the language of the resolution still triggered the War Powers Resolution on its own.
Russ Feingold: “The determination by the Parliamentarian leaves no doubt that the debate the Senate is engaged in today is an explicit…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the War Powers Resolution and the President's actions regarding military hostilities.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
You absolutely count to 50, but some of the names that have been put around already are people who have received votes from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee.
What I fear is, what they see is a what looks like a perfectly normal hearing. It looks like one, but it's not. It's based on a completely illicit a power grab to jam through a nominee right in the middle of an election at a time that has…
I don`t think people should be intimidated by Mitch McConnell`s threats, because you know what, he`ll do it anyway.
These Republican senators just have to know that their lives will go on, that they don't have to kowtow to President Trump anymore.





