I regret I will be unable to support the amendment offered by Senator Allard to provide for budget procedures designed to reduce our national debt. While I strongly agree with the goal of debt reduction, I cannot support the amendment because of several important flaws. First, the amendment calls for at least partially privatizing Social Security as part of an overall reform plan for that program. While I believe we need to pursue modest reforms to Social Security, I strongly oppose efforts to privatize that program. For the past seven decades, Social Security has worked to keep retirees out of poverty. Roughly half of seniors would in live poverty were it not for Social Security. It would be a great mistake to eliminate the fundamental shared security that program provides by moving to a privatized system. Second, while a policy of planned debt reduction may be meritorious, there are clearly times when it would be wise to temporarily suspend such plans.
Russ Feingold: “I regret I will be unable to support the amendment offered by Senator Allard to provide for budget procedures designed…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to budget procedures and Social Security during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
You absolutely count to 50, but some of the names that have been put around already are people who have received votes from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee.
Well, any example like Cassidy, where somebody is willing to stand up and go against their party, even if it`s on a procedural vote, John F. Kennedy wrote in 'Profiles in Courage' about those senators that had the courage to go against…
I would hope that the Kamala will use this as an opportunity to raise the obvious point that this country is deeply infected with racial injustice.
Now is the time to show resolve and roll out that legislation forcefully and more strong--much more stronger.





