Political Quotes

Russ Feingold: the reverse targeting amendment No. 3913 was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee and is cosponsored by several of…

On the recordFebruary 7, 2008
the reverse targeting amendment No. 3913 was approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee and is cosponsored by several of my colleagues. It simply ensures that the new authorities contained in this bill are not used to engage in what is known as reverse targeting of Americans here at home. FISA requires the Government to get a court order when it is wiretapping Americans on American soil. Reverse targeting refers to the possibility that the Government will try to get around this requirement by using these new authorities to wiretap someone overseas, when what the Government is trying to do and is interested in is the American with whom that foreign person is communicating. The bill pretends to ban reverse targeting, but this ban is so weak as to be meaningless. It would allow reverse targeting as long as the Government can claim it has some interest, however minor, in the foreigner it is wiretapping. The amendment says the Government needs an individualized court order when a significant purpose of the surveillance is to acquire communications of a person inside the United States. The Director of National Intelligence has testified that this practice, reverse targeting, is a violation of the fourth amendment. That is what the DNI says. This amendment merely codifies that constitutional principle. I strongly urge my colleagues to support this important amendment.
Said by
Russ Feingold
Democratic · Wisconsin

Editor's note · Context

Discussing the reverse targeting amendment during Senate floor debate.

Share

More from Russ Feingold

Mar 25, 2021

I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.

msnbc.com
Nov 8, 2017

We should impose sanctions on Corneille Nangaa, the head of the Independent National Electoral Commission.

congress.gov
Jan 21, 2021

It is clearly constitutional to hold this trial now and to have the vote on disqualification.

msnbc.com
Feb 8, 2021

Well, any example like Cassidy, where somebody is willing to stand up and go against their party, even if it`s on a procedural vote, John F. Kennedy wrote in 'Profiles in Courage' about those senators that had the courage to go against…

msnbc.com

Other voices in this conversation