The one suggested that any third grader would know that the PAC ban, with a backup provision, is unconstitutional. I am sorry, but I will say one thing about that. The Senator from Kentucky and the Senator from Washington voted for precisely that proposal 3 years ago under the Pressler amendment. So, apparently, at that time they did not understand, apparently, what any third grader would understand, which is that this in fact is constitutional, because it provides that, if the PAC ban is found unconstitutional, there is a backup provision. So that entire analysis disregards their own voting record and their own past position, which is that that is constitutional.
Russ Feingold: “The one suggested that any third grader would know that the PAC ban, with a backup provision, is unconstitutional. I am…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the constitutionality of the PAC ban during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
I don't think there's any question. They were egging each other on. It would have taken very little for somebody to try to up the ante and actually hang Mike Pence or kill somebody who they could get their hands on.
What I fear is, what they see is a what looks like a perfectly normal hearing. It looks like one, but it's not. It's based on a completely illicit a power grab to jam through a nominee right in the middle of an election at a time that has…
You absolutely count to 50, but some of the names that have been put around already are people who have received votes from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee.
Well, there is. And it isn`t because of the caucus, it`s because of the monstrous things that are being done that you just brilliantly reported on in Georgia.





