The one suggested that any third grader would know that the PAC ban, with a backup provision, is unconstitutional. I am sorry, but I will say one thing about that. The Senator from Kentucky and the Senator from Washington voted for precisely that proposal 3 years ago under the Pressler amendment. So, apparently, at that time they did not understand, apparently, what any third grader would understand, which is that this in fact is constitutional, because it provides that, if the PAC ban is found unconstitutional, there is a backup provision. So that entire analysis disregards their own voting record and their own past position, which is that that is constitutional.
Russ Feingold: “The one suggested that any third grader would know that the PAC ban, with a backup provision, is unconstitutional. I am…”
On the recordJune 25, 1996
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the constitutionality of the PAC ban during Senate floor debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Mar 25, 2021
I believe a public pressure will cause a reform or changing the filibuster at a minimum to make sure that a new voting rights bill will get through.
Mar 25, 2021
I don`t think people should be intimidated by Mitch McConnell`s threats, because you know what, he`ll do it anyway.
Jan 25, 2022
You absolutely count to 50, but some of the names that have been put around already are people who have received votes from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee.
Mar 25, 2021
It would be crazy for people to not do something strong now and make sure voting rights are protected out of some kind of a fear of what Mitch McConnell would do in the future.





