I don't think it's a reasonable approach to statutory interpretation to say that somehow you can import that language into another amendment that isn't there and that that isn't a prohibition.
Russ Feingold: “I don't think it's a reasonable approach to statutory interpretation to say that somehow you can import that language…”
On the recordOctober 12, 2009
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Feingold critiques the interpretation of statutory language in a legal context.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Sep 12, 2021
What they're putting out is you've heard of fake news. This is fake law. This is literally made-up law.
Nov 8, 2017
We should impose sanctions on Corneille Nangaa, the head of the Independent National Electoral Commission.
Jan 10, 2021
I believe this can be done. I do understand the desire to, of course, give Biden a chance to have his first 100 days. But I think people should especially think in terms of what is most likely to lead to a serious opportunity to vote on…
Oct 12, 2020
You may apply a legal standard to whether or not you should recuse yourself, but it's her decision. There's no appeal from it. She's not mandated to do it or not do it.





