Step 1 was our vote here in this body and in the House to say that the surge was unwise, and a majority did vote for that here, as well as in the House. This is step 2. This says that the fundamental underpinnings of this mistake should be reversed, that the resolution authorizing force in Iraq should be reversed. Yes, step 3, in my view, would be saying--to enforce it. Since the President won't listen to us, we need to turn to the ultimate power, the one the Senator from Kansas and I both agree is the appropriate power in this situation; that is, whether to use the power of the purse to remove funding.
Russ Feingold: “Step 1 was our vote here in this body and in the House to say that the surge was unwise, and a majority did vote for…”
On the recordMarch 14, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing steps to reverse the authorization of force in Iraq during a Senate debate.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Oct 12, 2020
You may apply a legal standard to whether or not you should recuse yourself, but it's her decision. There's no appeal from it. She's not mandated to do it or not do it.
Sep 12, 2021
The hypocrisy here is important. The fact that a state like Texas is invading the privacy of women on abortion... but they're saying that somehow, it's wrong to make sure that we all get a vaccine to protect each other.
Jul 26, 2021
I recommend Sarah Margon as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor.
Feb 8, 2021
This notion that somehow there couldn’t be an impeachment trial after the president leaves office, it’s over.





