I say to the leader, that is what the amendment process is for. Your amendment came up and, quite frankly, didn't prevail. Our amendment came up and did prevail, and there were many other amendments and we just stopped. I recognize there may be another version of the Paycheck Protection Act that may prevail. My problem is that it stopped at that point, and that is not the normal procedure. That is what I am asking for, that everybody do their amendments, and at the end of the day, I know, unless you change your mind--and I recognize you don't need to--that we still need 60 votes, but to have the amendments, to have everybody's ideas presented and voted on, is what we are asking for here.
Russ Feingold: “I say to the leader, that is what the amendment process is for. Your amendment came up and, quite frankly, didn't…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the amendment process related to the Paycheck Protection Act.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
You may apply a legal standard to whether or not you should recuse yourself, but it's her decision. There's no appeal from it. She's not mandated to do it or not do it.
It would be crazy for people to not do something strong now and make sure voting rights are protected out of some kind of a fear of what Mitch McConnell would do in the future.
Democracy and human rights go hand in hand, and DRL is at the forefront of implementing President Biden's commitment to human rights.
You absolutely count to 50, but some of the names that have been put around already are people who have received votes from Republicans on the Judiciary Committee.





