Obviously, the Senator from Massachusetts and I are not going to offer an amendment to provide unsafe treatments. In fact, the WHO guarantees the bioequivalency of a given product. And that just means they actually verify that it is exactly the same as a product that has been thoroughly tested for safety by an institution such as the FDA. So it is not a valid point that somehow this approach that we are suggesting will lead to products that are not safe. They are as safe as the ones we would use ourselves.
Russ Feingold: “Obviously, the Senator from Massachusetts and I are not going to offer an amendment to provide unsafe treatments. In…”
On the recordMay 15, 2003
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the safety of treatments in relation to a proposed amendment on HIV/AIDS.
Share
More from Russ Feingold
Jul 26, 2021
I recommend Sarah Margon as Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor.
Sep 12, 2021
The hypocrisy here is important. The fact that a state like Texas is invading the privacy of women on abortion... but they're saying that somehow, it's wrong to make sure that we all get a vaccine to protect each other.
Jul 26, 2021
I would argue the DRL's work has never been more important than it is right now, with democracy going head to head with the growing threats of kleptocracy and authoritarianism around the globe.
Sep 12, 2021
What they're putting out is you've heard of fake news. This is fake law. This is literally made-up law.





